What If You Invested $1,000 in TSMC on 1 June 2015?

The historical return in context

A $1,000 investment using the 1 June 2015 entry input is estimated at $25,353.34, approximately 25.35 times the starting amount, using data dated 9 October 2026.

This scenario follows TSMC through the TSM price series in U.S. dollars, from the stated starting date. Adjusted inputs are performance-calculation values rather than a reconstruction of actual share purchases.

The Investment Breakdown

The latest calculation input is $453.3100, dated 9 October 2026. This is a dated historical estimate rather than an intraday quote.

Methodology: Adjusted-price return estimate: the investment is multiplied by the ratio of latest to historical Yahoo Finance adjusted close, where available. Adjusted prices reflect splits and distributions and approximate a return with dividends reinvested; this is not a reconstruction of brokerage transactions. Unadjusted close is used when adjusted data is unavailable. The prices are calculation inputs, not necessarily the prices an investor could trade at. Calculated units are synthetic adjusted units, not actual shares purchased. Tax, fees, currency conversion and slippage are excluded.

What investors were weighing at the start

The key story was TSMC maintaining advanced manufacturing leadership while customers such as Apple, Nvidia and AMD drove new technology cycles.

Manufacturing chips for other companies

TSMC’s 2015 annual report describes its pure-play foundry model: manufacturing semiconductors for customers. This is different from a company whose investment case depends mainly on selling its own branded processor designs.

The distinction connects TSMC to several end markets. Customers can compete with each other while using the same manufacturing platform. Investors therefore need to consider process capability, capacity and customer demand together; strength in one product category does not eliminate the broader semiconductor cycle.

Source: Primary source for this milestone or investment structure.

How the investment economics work

A foundry commits capital to fabrication plants and equipment before it knows exactly how customers will use capacity. Manufacturing yield and the ability to meet demanding process requirements influence returns on that spending. More advanced chips create opportunity while making execution and cost control especially important.

This scenario follows the U.S.-traded TSM depositary-share series in USD, not a Taiwan-dollar purchase. Geopolitics, export controls, currency and customer concentration are separate from technological capability. A high-quality process does not by itself answer whether the shares are attractively valued.

What the final value does—and does not—tell us

Business performance and investment returns are related, but the valuation paid also matters. Improving operations can coincide with falling shares if investors expected more or reduce the price they will pay for future earnings.

TSMC shows how a behind-the-scenes infrastructure leader can compound across multiple technology trends.

Different Investment Amounts

These examples scale the same unrounded return multiple and use the same valuation date. They are illustrations of one historical holding period, not forecasts.

Risks investors faced

TSMC investors faced semiconductor cycles, geopolitical tensions, supply-chain disruptions, technology competition and market volatility.

Frequently asked questions

What would $1,000 invested at this starting point be worth?

A $1,000 investment using the 1 June 2015 entry input is estimated at $25,353.34, approximately 25.35 times the starting amount, using data dated 9 October 2026. Figures change when the market dataset is refreshed, except for fixed final outcomes.

Which investment does this scenario follow?

This scenario follows TSMC through the TSM price series in U.S. dollars, from the stated starting date. Adjusted inputs are performance-calculation values rather than a reconstruction of actual share purchases.

Did stock splits create this return?

No. A split changes share count and price proportionally. Adjusted historical inputs make dates comparable; the calculation units should not be read as the exact shares purchased in a brokerage account.

Is this a forecast for a new investment?

No. It describes a particular historical entry and holding period. The calculation assumes continued exposure over that period and does not establish whether that would have suited an individual investor.

Compare the result

Explore Nvidia, Broadcom, ASML, or browse all scenarios. Check each scenario’s starting and valuation dates before comparing cumulative results: a longer holding period can change the conclusion.

Important: WWIBWN presents historical scenarios for education and context. This is not financial advice. Past performance does not predict future returns.